MULTICULTURALISM

 

In 2022 clashes broke out between Hindu and Muslim communities in the UK. 2022 Leicester unrest - Wikipedia .What made these clashes unusual is the fact that these communities have lived side by side for generations. They even originated from the same part of India. This has led me to ponder about the nature of multiculturalism.

It's obvious that multiculturalism is not a natural thing since originally humans evolved their traits depending on the environment. Only over the last 500 years have people been migrating in vast numbers to places where other people already live.

Humans have evolved survival instincts that involve them conforming to their "tribe".
1) Religion. Believing in a higher power creates conformity within a tribe. This is why questioning religion was seen as taboo, "heretics" were often banished or executed. A tribe that had a different religion was seen as a threat. Many wars we see in the world today are between people of different religions. Sometimes even within different interpretations of the same religion. (Sunni Vs Shia)
2) Disease. One tribe with immunity to a virus passing it on to another without immunity was nearly always fatal. Fear or hate of those who didn't look or talk like your fellow people was essential to survival.

Our hardwired instincts still operate in the 21st century regardless of if they still make sense or not. The Men's Dictionary: OBSOLETE BIOLOGICAL WIRING (the-mens-dictionary.blogspot.com) From what I can see multiculturalism "works" in todays society only because of modern day artificial constraints.
1) Social conditioning. In the space of one lifetime we have gone from employers having signs saying "no blacks, no Irish" to diversity quotas and training. Why some of this was a good thing it seems that things are going too far in the other direction.
2) Authoritian governments. The people of Armenia and Azerbaijan may hate each other but under the ruthless rule of the Soviet Union couldn't act upon it until the country collapsed. Similarly as bad as Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi were, their removal triggered fighting between various rival groups. I'd argue overall the world is worse off due to the extra terrorism and refugees created by these new conflicts.
3) Economic good times. When people are doing well in life they tend to care less about the family down the road having a different religion or skin colour. In fact many welcome people from poor countries to do the dirty, dangerous or boring jobs they don't want to do. When the economic hard times arrive this goes hand in hand with hatred of foreigners. History is full of examples of this from the rise of the Nazis in the 1930s to rise of far right groups against immigrants in Europe today triggered by the economic hard times from Covid and the Ukraine war.

As western society's collapse this is going to have serious implications. I only see non multicultural places like Japan dying quietly. 

RED PILL EXAMPLE - Coffee date Vs Dinner date

 

When you think of the words "first date" one of the images that come into your head is that of a man taking a woman out to dinner at a nice restaurant, paying for everything and hoping to "get lucky". We see this all the time on films, TV shows and online dating adverts. Women will often state directly "it's what men should do", despite the fact that some men will often go for cheaper/simpler options in the modern era such as coffee.

There are two variables to consider.

A cheap date (coffee) Vs an expensive date (dinner)
A woman's interest in the man can be high or lukewarm.

Expensive date / Woman's interest is lukewarm.
Although a woman is not that into the man she will often still go along with the date for the free food. A third of the women you date are only in it for free food: study (nypost.com) Even worse is the fact that a lot of women have friends with benefits. They will use one guy for food and entertainment, send him on his way then spend the night with another man who doesn't care about or do anything for her. This scenario is a lot more common than most men are comfortable with.

Cheap date / Woman's interest is lukewarm.
The easiest way around the above situation is to refuse to take her on an expensive date in the first place. If a woman's interest is high she will agree to something simple. If she is pushing you to take her out for dinner, you stand your ground and refuse and she loses interest. Congratulations you have just weeded out a timewaster and a gold digger.

Expensive date / Woman's interest is High.
In the old days men HAD to take women out on expensive and demonstrate extensively their long term provider abilities before they got anywhere near a woman's bedroom door. Today many women will have sex with a random stranger within hours of meeting him at a bar or club. Modern dating coaches have discovered that spending lots of money before sex will put you into the "provider" category in her mind and will increase the amount of time/effort/money it takes before having sex with her. Women's Three Buttons - Alpha Male 2.0 (alphamale20.com)

Cheap date / Woman's interest is High.

This is the best outcome, once a sexual relationship has been established then you can take her out on expensive dates but not before. (and don't overdo it).

Conclusion.
Over many years men went out on dates making notes about what worked with women and what didn't. They didn't listen to what women said by went by their actions. Women complain about men not taking them out on proper dates but won't complain about the other women who use men for the free food or give sex on the first date. 

 

BETAIZATION

 "Women demand behaviours from men that will turn them off sexually to that man in the long run."

A woman's prime directive is to get the seed of an Alpha male. Then convert that man into a beta. This is where the female fantasy of changing / taming / fixing a bad boy comes from. The high rates of single motherhood shows how often this strategy fails. In which case the woman finds an actual beta male or relies on the state to support her.

Every man who has been in a relationship will experience betaization to some degree. In the initial stages of a relationship the woman will make demands for exclusivity, to meet his family and to move in together.

The man complies with these demands only to find only temporary improvement in his relationship. No man has ever got more frequent / more intense sex after moving in with his girlfriend.

As the relationship progresses the woman will start complaining about things that never bothered her when they were casually dating. Such as leaving the toilet seat up, not liking one of his friends or the fact that he likes to go fishing on Sunday afternoon.

She complains about the very things she found exciting about him when they first met. Such as him being a singer in a local band and riding a big Harley Davidson. She now wants him to quit the band, sell his motorbike and get something more "appropriate".

The woman's demands will usually be accompanied by nagging, the silent treatment and the use of sex as a bargaining tool. Again she did no such thing in the early stages of the relationship and probably innated a lot of the sex herself.

Each time the man complies with her demands she is temporarily happy only to later issue more demands. The badass Alpha male eventually becomes a submissive beta after dozens of individual demands over many years. Paradoxically she turns her man into the type of person she would never have dated initially. At this point she (often secretly) despises him and the odds of divorce, cheating or dead bedroom skyrocket.

Betaization is a part of a woman's hardwired biology and not done from a position of malice or even conscious awareness. The only way to counteract this is to be aware of it and act accordingly. Ignore a woman's demands for beta male behaviour and continue with the Alpha male behaviour that attracted her to you in the first place. Every bitchy demanding woman is the end result of a man who continually wouldn't say no.

Just as women get turned off by men who comply with all their demands the opposite is also true. It's nothing unusual to hear a woman complaining about how her man won't take her on proper dates, meet his family or how he spends too much time in the pub with his friends. Yet the woman will continue to date him often for years when she could easily replace him with a man who would do all those things for her.

Avoiding betaization is the foundation of relationship game.

INCELS

 

NOTE: For the purposes of this post, I will define an Incel as "a man who wants to have sex, but hasn't done so in the last year". Incels are simply the inevitable end product of a society that has moved away from traditional marriage. Women are increasingly choosing to have sex with the top 10-20% of men, meaning that men at the bottom get left out. The Number of Sexless Men Has Tripled in 10 Years - YouTube

"When debating gender issues, an opponent may call you a misogynist or an Incel. This is often not because you are a misogynist or an Incel but because they lack the desire or skills to debate rationally & respectfully so they turn to insults & irrational accusations". Phil Mitchell: Male abuse specialist.

INCEL AS AN INSULT

This is basically just an Ad hominem attack. If your opponent could argue against your point with facts and logic, they would do it. A man's sexual history has absolutely no relevance to the validity of an argument. Ironically, this slur is constantly used by the same feminists and white knights who say you shouldn't judge a woman by her sexual history. 

Implying that a man's worth is determined by his ability to have sex with lots of women is about as "patriarchal" as you can get.

The obvious illogical use of the word can be demonstrated by the fact that members of the political party Reform are branded as "young incels" while also being exposed for domestic violence. How can you be an incel if you attract women enough for them to move in with you?

MANY MEN ARE ONLY A BREAKUP AWAY FROM BEING INCEL THEMSELVES

Or a year away from their partner, suddenly giving them the "not tonight, I have a headache" excuse night after night. Which makes it a little stupid to use it as an insult to other men. Strangely enough, men stuck in sexless marriages don't seem to be included in any discussion about incels.

I have even seen passport bros use the word as an insult, even though they would have no chance of getting laid in their own Western country. 

MUSLIM TERRORISTS ARE USUALLY LEFT OUT OF ANY DEBATE ABOUT INCELS 

Countries like Saudi Arabia have a sexually repressed society where rich men can have up to 4 wives. It's almost always the single man blowing themselves up or joining extreme groups like ISIS. 9/11 was an incel job. 

INCEL MEANS JUST THAT INVOLUNTARY 

If women reject a man because he's ugly, it's obviously something he has no control over. Mocking a man because of this is on par with mocking someone for being physically disabled. The popularity of Incel as a throwaway insult is the biggest indicator that people don't care for the average man or his problems. He's invisible and is dismissed as low status rather than afforded actual compassion. 

By contrast, it's easy to find countless stories in the media of women who complain that they can't find a "good man". The 30-something women who have NEVER had a boyfriend - and they all blame modern dating culture | Daily Mail Online. Typically, they will blame men for not measuring up rather than their own life choices, such as prioritising their careers, dating players/bad boys or getting fat. Imagine the comments section if this were 3 young men who couldn't get a girlfriend.  

Women often pursue some of the most vile men in society, yet get little to no backlash for doing so. Incel hardly reflects on an individual man's "quality". 

THE MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE MANOSPHERE / RED PILL COMMUNITY ARE NOT INCELS 

Most men in the online forums I have been part of since the start of 2017 are usually married men who have been screwed over in divorces. I was blindsided by the sudden breakup of a 5-year relationship. There are even former pickup artists who have burned out. These forums often have strict rules against "Incel language" and will frequently ban people who promote any kind of violence against women.

Incels who comply are usually advised to improve their social and dating skills or failing that, help them to divert their anger and frustration away from women and live the best life possible.

Associating the manosphere with a tiny minority of Incels who do advocate violence against women on sites like 4chan is another strategy used by feminists and white knights who can't argue with logic and reason.  

HAVING A LARGE NUMBER OF SEXLESS YOUNG MEN IS VERY BAD FOR SOCIETY. 

Having Regular Sex Is Important To Society - Alpha Male 2.0 (alphamale20.com). If you cared about society, you would care about helping Incels. These men have no incentive to participate in society or improve their lives. They don't need to work overtime on Saturday morning to pay the mortgage or buy stuff for the kids when they still live at home with their parents. This is an economic disaster. These men are perfect candidates to join extreme groups like the far right to vent their anger and frustration.  The Coming Far Right Backlash - YouTube

WOMEN ACTIVELY OPPOSE THE VERY THINGS THAT WOULD HELP INCELS. 

I'm not a traditional right-wing conservative, society will not go back to how it was in 1950, when most people went to church and got married before the age of 25. Let's be realistic...

Helping young men improve their social and dating skills. This is just obvious; however, many of the websites are quarantined (Red pill Reddit) or outright banned completely under the deliberately vague banner of misogyny. It's perfectly fine to teach women how to exploit men for money, hide their sexual pasts or whore themselves out on OnlyFans. Men who just want to improve their dating skills have to find hidden forums to do so. Having sex just a few times a year would be sufficient to keep a lot of men off actual hate sites on 4chan. No One Would Have Died If Elliot Rodger had learned Game 

Fully legal and regulated prostitution. Some men are beyond hope (see photo of Incel murderer Jake Davidson), and all the dating tips in the world won't help. Again, giving men like this that option would probably divert most of them away from hate-filled 4chan sites. Yet I don't see feminists campaigning for legal prostitution; in fact, quite the opposite, where men are actively shamed for using prostitutes. The same goes for sex dolls.

MGTOW teaches men to live their best lives without women. Again, women shame men who are literally "going their own way". A View From Above - YouTube

Foreign brides. Again, women will often shame a middle-aged man who comes back to the UK with a young woman from SE Asia. Yet you don't see men shaming fat middle-aged women for bringing home a toy boy from Gambia.

WOMEN PROPOSE NO SOLUTION. 

Women may think a particular man is an unattractive loser, but no problem, her life, her opinion. But she doesn't seem to want that same man to learn dating skills, use legal prostitution, go MGTOW or even get married abroad. I'm at a loss as to what women propose. This has some sinister implications for the female thought process.

WOMEN'S "ADVICE" HAS CREATED A LOT OF THE MONSTER THEY NOW HATE. 

Men are constantly bombarded with the message that women want a nice, caring, loyal, unthreatening, emotionally open boyfriend on the feminist path. Only to spend their lives in soul-crushing celibacy while watching the same women practically throw themselves at players, badboys and keep going back to their abusive exes. When men call women out on this, their default response is to shame men for "feeling entitled to sex" or "being nice to me doesn't entitle you to my body". SEE FRIENDZONE Hardly a surprise when some men explode in anger and frustration.

Further reading: Confessions of a Reformed InCel | M3 (wordpress.com) 

LOSER (Female)

 

"A woman can be 45 years old, still living with her parents, earning minimum wage at Macdonald's, having no ambitions in life other than watching trash TV. Yet society still won't label her a loser"

We are all familiar with the concept of a male loser. The middle aged video game player who is overweight and lives in his mothers basement. So in the interest of balance it's only fair that we define a female equivalent. Here are several factors that contribute to a female being a "loser". 

SINGLE MOTHER

The only 100% exception I'd make to this was if a woman was widowed. I'd make a partial exception if her children were at least teenagers and her split with their dad was amicable.

She picked her child's dad over hundreds of other men who propositioned her throughout her adult life. If he's a deadbeat, she split from him while the children were young (she couldn't "fix" him), or even worse multiple baby daddies. This screams out LOSER.

Very attractive in her 20s but her life's a mess in middle age.

She won a genetic lottery that should have landed her an easy life such as marrying a rich banker. Instead she squandered her prime years on players and bad boys. The female equivalent of Michael Carroll. 

Her dating profile is a long list of demands. 

She's desperately trying to give the impression that she's high value and can afford to be so picky. She goes on lots of first dates but hardly ever seems to be in a relationship. It's the equivalent to putting a showroom price tag on a 10 year old car. She then claims to be Single because men don't meet her above unrealistic demands or can't handle a "strong independent women". The reality is that a high value man has far better options. Bonus points for Marilyn Monroe quote on her Facebook profile.

A variation on this theme is bragging about all the men she rejects. Such as the socially awkward guy or the one who didn't own a car. High value women (young, attractive, childless, pleasant to be around) get more offers and therefore reject more men than anyone else. Yet it's only the older women who feel the need to broadcast their rejections on social media.

Constantly brags about how "strong and independent" she is.

Bonus points for "I don't need a man". A look at her dating profile will usually say "online today". Go figure!!!
Will try to use her successful career as a selling point (that men don't care about). 

Celeb Jones busts the strong independent woman myth here. Strong, Independent Woman? Are You Sure That's What You Are? - Alpha Male 2.0 (alphamale20.com)

Has a meltdown when men reject her.

The second she meets a man who (nearly) satisfies her insane checklist of demands but he rejects her, she explodes. He's a shallow misogynist for wanting a young, slim, childless woman without mental health issues. 

Gives off a general man hating vibe / Feminist.

She doesn't actually hate "all men" but her own inability to attract high value men and get them to stick around for the long term. When the last dozen men have all pumped and dumped her she never considers the fact that she doesn't have the personality to make these men want to stick around.

Posts "advice" that she'd never follow herself.

3AM thoughts, relationship quotes, she spent her entire adult life doing the exact opposite and only wants to do the "right thing" now she's pushing 40 and got some deadbeats kids in toe.

Promotes fat acceptance.

A condition that kills around 85 people a day in the UK. She'd never date a fat man and often posts photos of lean muscular male models as her ideal. 

Uses the phrase "real man".

Standard social blackmail that always describes a man who she would never have dated in her 20s. Also accurately describes a slave.

Uses the word "Incel" as an insult.

This is worth a separate post all by itself.

Pretends to care about men's issues.

Sometimes she takes a break from man hating to share a viral post on male suicide. Advising men to be open about their feelings and problems. Despite the fact she would never date a man who does this. A week later she takes down her "be kind" logo and goes back to bragging about how she dumped the socially awkward guy on the first date.

If you deleted all the women on social media who have a #BeKind emblem on their profile photo. Then you'll be left only with women who may actually be genuinely kind and not self absorbed attention seekers.

Endless selfies.

She has a pretty face, but it reeks of desperation when she changes her profile picture every week. She has the same desperate men telling her "she's beautiful" or similar. Who of course she will never date in a million years. Bonus points for strategic face shots that hide her not so attractive figure.

At the gym posts .

But she hasn't lost an ounce of her ample fat in the past year.

Has no real interests in life.

Except trash TV such as The Kardashians, Big brother, Geordie Shores. Especially shows like Love island that give completely unrealistic perceptions on dating and relationships.

GAY PEOPLE

 

A question asked on a men's forum was. Why are there so many gay people these days ?

Personally I believe it's a combination of nature and nurture.

Nature - Some people are Gay by default, homosexuality has been observed elsewhere in the animal kingdom. I know 3 men who were obviously gay before they "came out". All were raised in traditional families with masculine, alpha male dads. Furthermore gay men do not need to hide anymore unlike in the old days where it was illegal. In my home town a pub was run successfully by a gay couple for several years. It's safe to say that 30-40 years ago they would have had bricks put through their windows.

Nurture - I read a book called "inside the firm" by Tony Lambrianou. (Kray twins associate). A third of the book details life during the 15 years he spent in prison. He estimates that 10% of men who were completely straight on the outside (often with wives and children), turned to homosexuality while on the inside. Often young men at their sexual peak serving long sentences.

This strongly suggests that "gayness" (for lack of a better term) falls on a spectrum. Under certain conditions like prison some people will turn that way. Obviously with the majority of young women chasing a small percentage of men, society is walking into a world where half of men are celibate. Other factors such as the constant feminisation of men would be a likely contribution.

Increasing homosexuality was a result of the mouse utopia experiment. https://youtu.be/5m7X-1V9nOs?t=262 

MARRIAGE

"Getting married in the 21st century is like building a house on land you will never own" 

Disclaimer - In many countries co habitation after a certain length of time can be treated by the law as actual marriage Cohabitation – your rights | The Law Society

Why modern marriage fails

The law is almost always on her side if it fails -  Marriage laws were written when most men were traditional breadwinners and most women were stay at home wives. There is nothing to stop her making up any story and you will be guilty until proven innocent. If there are children involved multiply this by a factor of ten. Getting married is like betting your future life, wealth and sanity on a woman not changing her mind.

Divorce - More than half of marriages end this way with the woman initiating two thirds of them. She can just decide to quit and any time and will often get rewarded for doing so. Even if you could prove 100% in court that you did nothing wrong.

Cheating (her) - Technology and social acceptance makes it easier for her to cheat than ever. If this happens you have 2 choices. 1) Dump her and face the legal and financial nightmare that follows. Or 2) Forgive her, the very act of taking her back confirms that you are an optionless beta male and will downgrade her attraction to you even further.

It's a one sided deal now - A woman once gave her youth, beauty, and sexual exclusivity. In return the man took care of her financially for the rest of her life. Today the average woman settles down much later, the idea of her being sexually exclusive to one man is just a joke. Yet the man is still expected to comply with the traditional marriage contract.

Dead bedroom - At the time of writing dead bedrooms on reddit has 409000 members. It's one of the most common complaints from men who are in long term relationships. Sometimes using sex as a bargaining chip. None of these men were complaining about sexual frequency when they first signed up for living together or marriage. She probably innated a lot of the sex herself. 

Not getting her sexual best - More and more men are discovering that their sexually reserved wives were far more adventurous with the players and bad boys who came before them. Paying for a woman's sexual retirement, no thanks !!!

She changes personality - Complains about his friends, habits or hobbies when married that she had no issue with when casually dating. Complying with her demands will just lead to more demands and reduced attraction.

She changes physically - Take a look at the wife of Pierce Brosnan who piled on the weight after marriage. Say what you want, but the simple fact is that he would never had gone near her if she looked like that when they first met. If it can happen to a James Bond actor what chance have the rest of us got.

Cheating (you) - If she gets fat, bitchy, sexless and you have options elsewhere. You will be seriously temped to use them. The odds are you will get caught and society will treat you a lot differently than if she had cheated on you. 

Statistically speaking, you will never be happily married. If you survive all of the above the most likely outcome is a boring or stressful marriage that drags on for decades. Many of your great grandparents back in the "good old days" had marriages that were like this. Too many people today are stuck in marriages they would be better off out of but can't leave because of social or financial reasons.

Further reading What "Successful" Old Age Looks Like - Alpha Male 2.0 (alphamale20.com)

There will always be high school sweethearts that are still happy together after a lifetime of marriage but these are the big exception (maybe 3% of the population) rather than the rule.

 

 

LONG COVID - What I learned from having an invisible illness.

 

"I'd rather spend another year in lockdown than another 6 months with long covid"

I wasn't massively worried about catching covid, I was fit, healthy and often went years without having a single day off work. I had no issues with having the vaccine but due to high demand it wasn't available where I lived. I just wasn't prepared to travel 20 miles by public transport to get it. It was a case of "I'll get it when it's available".

In July 2021 I was struck down with headaches and fatigue. The lateral flow tests (provided by work that were not that good) were negative. I simply assumed that I had a migraine as I was a life long sufferer. I also didn't have many of the common covid symptoms such as loss of taste, coughs or a high temperature. 

After a week I'd started to recover, after 2 weeks I'd describe myself as 80% recovered. But then I stayed at that same level for days, weeks, months. Headaches, fatigue and sore throats that were constantly reoccurring. Eventually I had to travel a 30 mile round trip and pay for a private blood test to confirm what I suspected, I did actually get covid. I did get vaccinated but by that point it was too late.

Long covid was horrendous because of the nature of the illness. I could have a sore throat so bad on Friday night I couldn't swallow food. Only to be perfectly fine the following morning. I could go out and socialise then suddenly feel bad again after a single beer. The near continuous low level headaches were particularly worrying. Then I'd have 2 or 3 days where I believed I was getting better only to go back to square one. The nature of the illness left me in a strange no mans land. I wasn't so ill I couldn't attend work but at the same time it was a struggle. I had a brand new illness that I had no way of knowing when I would ever recover.

WORK DIDN'T CARE

I didn't want to be off work sick long term because I would be bored out of my mind at home. Especially after all of the months spent in lockdown. At the same time I couldn't have lots of individual days off on my worst days due to the way work measures absenteeism. Bradford Factor - Wikipedia 

Since I did a physically demanding job and didn't "look ill" I constantly had to keep reminding people about my condition that led to additional stress. 

DOCTORS DIDN'T CARE

Phoning up the doctors was like having a conversation with an automated voice recording. "Rest, drink water, take standard painkillers". All the stuff I could read in a 20 second search on google. I got sick of explaining that you can only take standard painkillers for a certain number of days stated on the instructions. Eventually I just gave up and suffered in silence.

FRIENDS DIDN'T CARE

As with work not "looking ill" people just assume that nothing is wrong with you. While I tried to get out and socialise as much as possible after lockdown. I was frequently cancelling plans due to feeling fine Saturday morning and feeling terrible just 8 hours later. Or going out and having to leave early with everyone demanding that I stay out.

Sitting in home on Saturday night during lockdown knowing that everyone else is in the same boat was a lot easier that sitting at home knowing that everyone else is out enjoying themselves.  

SOCIAL MEDIA

Typically it was regularly flooded with conspiracy theories, anti lockdown and anti vaccination garbage. 

Whenever I mentioned my experience with long covid all of these people stuck their heads in the sand and didn't even reply.

One of the biggest regrets of my adult life is not getting vaccinated sooner. Thankfully after 6 long months the symptoms went away and I could enjoy life again at the start of 2022.

CASHLESS SOCIETY - Why I'm not worried

 

Personally I think people are freaking out a bit too much. Many people on social media are envisioning a George Orwell 1984 future where the government micromanages everyone's spending. I don't believe anything of the sort will happen for several reasons.

The government already can access your earnings before you receive them, it's called tax and national insurance. They could pass laws forcing people to pay fines in the current system anyway. 

The banknotes in your wallet are only worth as much as the government says so (that people claim to mistrust so much).

Governments are usually slow and incompetent, the idea they could successfully implement a cashless society in the next few years is far fetched. It could well happen over a much longer timescale (decades). Very few places currently refuse cash, the one's I have seen that do get named and shamed on social media and people take their business elsewhere. People were making claims about a cashless society by the year 2000 in 1993. 

The Uk is issuing new King Charles banknotes, not exactly rushing in a cashless society. At the time of writing they won't be in circulation for another year. 

I have personally witnessed people going mad about a cashless society on Facebook, only to see them paying by card in the pub. Most people go cashless by choice. 

There are obvious alternatives to do transactions without the government knowing, gold, crypto, hiding money in foreign bank accounts, barter economy etc. 

The people freaking out the most about cashless are usually the same people who were predicting North Korean police states and apocalyptic depopulation back in 2020 which of course never happened. Most are getting angry instead of actually discussing workable solutions. 

The "George Orwell 1984 crowd" seem to be forgetting that there's a world of difference between the government knowing everything you do and successfully acting upon that information. CCTV coverage is everywhere and yet they won't prosecute let alone properly punish shoplifters. Even when it's a clearly identified and well known junkie doing it. The people who believe in the worse case scenarios ironically have more faith in the governments power than most peoples.  

Recommended viewing How To Protect From CBDCs

FRIENDZONE

"I’ve been friend-zoned before and remember it being some of the most frustrating, mentally clouding times of my life. The friend-zone is anguishing. Overcoming it happened when I started assuming every girl has slutty tendencies and will use weak guys for money, attention, gifts, or whatever it is that they are lacking." GOLDMUND

A common parasitic social arrangement where a man is attracted to a women, but she is not attracted to him. This can sometimes happen after a relationship ends. Instead of doing the right thing and giving a man the courtesy of not wasting their time with a woman who has no romantic interest in them. The woman will always make the offer of "Let's just be friends". She knows full well that he wants more than that but offers him "friendship" for no other purpose than to string him along for attention and favours. 

The woman dangles the carrot of sex or a potential relationship but keeps it just out of reach. She bombards him with compliments such as "you are a great man", "You'd make a great boyfriend but not right now", or the ironic "I wish my boyfriend was like you". Sometimes she puts her arm around him as they walk down the street or he might get a quick drunken kiss on New years eve.

The woman takes advantage of the mans good nature and the fact he's attracted to her to manipulate him to do things such as. Buying her drinks when she's short of money, helping her move house or being a shoulder to cry on when her relationships with players and bad boys reach their obvious conclusion. 

It's not in her interest for the man to get into an actual relationship with another woman. She gives him dating  "advice" that will never work such as "just be yourself" and "you don't need to change for anyone".

If the man complains or calls out her behaviour the standard responses are "Being nice doesn't entitle you to my body" and "You are not owed sex for anything". She shames the man for trying to get sex out of the friendship to cover up the fact she's using the same friendship to get attention and favours. These standard lines are shaming tactics to make the man feel guilty about wanting sex by the same women who are having lots of sex themselves. 

The man wouldn't feel that he was "owed sex" if she wasn't stringing him along in a way to suggest that sex would happen in the first place. He was playing by the very rules that she has clearly stated that would work and demonstrating to her that he was good relationship material.

Even worse is the fact that the woman has sex with lots of men who don't play by her rules (players and bad boys) often within a few hours of meeting them at the club. While he gets strung along for months or even years without getting anything. Yet he is the one condemned for calling out her hypocrisy. 

 “For every woman who complains she was used for sex, there are hundreds of male orbiters a woman used for male attention whom she didn't intend to have sex with, but made them think they had a shot.”

The woman who claims "nice guys are not entitled to sex" is almost always the same woman who thinks that by having spontaneous sex with a good looking player it entitles her to his commitment. She constantly complains about being "sex zoned" but sees nothing wrong with stringing along men. The male player gets sex while giving minimal time/attention while the female player gets time/attention while giving minimal sex. In both scenarios society will never blame the woman.

The easiest solution is to learn how to identify friend zoning and avoid it happening in the first place. 

 Recommended reading The Utility of Beta Men – Part I (therationalmale.com)

GAY MARRIAGE

"That’s the best part. Gay marriage benefits straight marriage because it’ll show the bullshit injustice for what It is. Man hating."

Marriage is a bad idea full stop. Since I'm not a religious right wing conservative I have no specific objection to gay marriage. If gay people want to put themselves through the legal and financial minefield that straight couples do then they are welcome to it.

I do see an actual benefit to gay marriage, the more of them there are then inevitably the more of them will fail. People will see courts treating both people equally in sharp contrast to straight marriage, where the law nearly always favours the woman. 

SEXUAL REVOLUTION

 

"The importance and impact of this little fun drug cannot be overstated...it was a fundamental disruption to the evolutionary imperative" COLTTAINE.
"In 1960 to sleep with a girl you were expected to marry her, in 1970 to be a virgin upon leaving high school was considered taboo." Whatifalthist 

Theoretically the birth control pill enabled humans to indulge in the basic drive for sex without the biological cost of reproduction. It set off a chain of events that completely changed society.

Sex before marriage became socially acceptable. Men no longer had to sign a lifetime contract in order to have sex. The marriage rate plummets as well as the value of sex to men.

Women could now have sex with traditionally unsuitable men. Previously society would have strongly encouraged her to marry a man with good long term prospects (such as the trainee doctor). Now she could have sex with the good looking but unemployed local criminal.

Birth control was not 100% effective. Coupled with the exploding rates of sexual promiscuity often with men who were poor long term choices. It led to an increase in single mothers.

Women regressed back to their primeval mate selection. Choosing men based on prehistoric survival criteria. Men who were physically and socially dominant even if he was a criminal. Women were increasingly choosing to have sex with the top 20% of men as was the norm in prehistoric times. It wasn't the "free love" utopia that men were expecting.

Abortion was legalised to combat the rates of single motherhood. Effectively introducing one form of birth control to combat the failure of another. However this had little effect as it seems women had been getting abortions of the black market variety anyway. 

The marriage rate decreases even further. Men were no longer socially forced to marry women because of an "accidental pregnancy" because of legalised abortion.

More women enter the workforce. When a woman out earns her husband the odds of her divorcing him increase. 

Crime increases due to less stable family units, there is a slight decrease in crime during the 1990s. Some believe a reduction in unwanted children due to legal abortion. 

The divorce rate increases. It was easier to get divorced due to changes in the law. It's obvious that trying to revert back to a 1950s style marriage in middle age after experiencing a decade and a half of "free love" wasn't going to work.

Average age of marriage and first child increases. Birth rate drops below replacement rate for many western countries which will eventually lead to their collapse. 

 

LOCKDOWN

 

"Natural disasters are like weddings, they bring out the best and worst in people."

The coronavirus lockdown of 2020 was an interesting study into how people behave when disaster strikes. Here are a few observations I made during that time.

Women who bragged on Facebook about how "strong and independent" they are suddenly went very quiet.  

Many people who previously labelled me a "loser" for not owning my own house and car. Got horribly exposed for not being able to survive more than a couple of weeks without a regular income. 

Many people who'd previously advised me to "find a good woman and settle down" found out how compatible with their partners they actually were during hard times.  

3 women who previously payed me little attention suddenly popped up on Facebook messenger wanting to chat. I made my excuses and ignored them.

Many friendships are superficial. We met in the pub at weekend and watched football. Take that away and we had few things in common. This inspired me to join meetup and expand my social circle when lockdown ended.

Some people did great things. Such as volunteering to take food to the elderly. Some people did terrible things such as pushing the elderly out the way during the panic buying spree.

Boycotts that never happened. Social media was full of people claiming they were never buying anything made in china again. Shops that wouldn't take cash or vastly inflated prices during panic buying season. When lockdown ended and life went back to normal this got completely forgotten about. 

Most people are unprepared for next time. What percentage of people have a months supply of food and toilet paper at home. Answer: Not many.

Lockdown was the perfect opportunity to get fit and cut down on alcohol, many failed. The "I don't have time" excuse wasn't there anymore. I was shocked at the number of people who piled on the pounds and drank endless amounts of alcohol sitting in home. I did the exact opposite.

Protesting doesn't work. No government ever changed it's policy because of people getting angry in the street. 

Right wing popularist governments are terrible for dealing with pandemics. USA and Brazil had high death rates (and no I'm not a left winger). 

The political divide in society is getting worse. We had the "don't lockdown and let all the old/sick die" at one end of the scale and the "we should keep locking down forever" at the other. With few rational suggestions in-between.  

People who couldn't cope with the gym being closed. The internet is full of information on how to get fit and strong at home. Examples include minus the gym on YouTube and the excellent book convict conditioning. Instead a lot of people were constantly complaining on social media instead of dealing with the situation. Ironically many of these people were from the manosphere who brand themselves as "Alpha Males". Some of these people actually believe "the government closed the gyms to make them fat so they could control them". Well it didn't work with me.

Good times create weak men. Western civilization has lived through the easiest time in human history. Free of wars pandemics, national service and 60 hour working weeks down the coal mine. People couldn't cope with even the most minor inconvenience such as wearing a face mask at the supermarket. The "I'll sit back, light a cigar and watch while civilization burns" crowd got exposed for this.

We are not heading towards an authoritian society. Many people who broke lockdown rules got let off with just a warning. Small pathetic fines were often reduced on appeal or not paid at all. Even the police openly admitted they didn't have the resources to enforce the rules. Hardly the behaviour of a "police state" that so many people claim.

Many people turned to coping mechanisms. Endless speculation about if the virus was man made. It makes no difference to most peoples personal lives even if it was true. People have a phycological need to assign blame. 

Conspiracy theories. (This deserves an entire website of it's own). All claim to know "the truth" but completely incapable of coming up with a consistent story between them. The virus is a biological weapon but also no worse than the flu. Many posting theories on social media completely contradicting what they were posting 3 months earlier. 

Anti-Vaxxers. There's a world of difference between rejecting the vaccine, making your point and accepting the consequences. Then there's the people who are obsessed with it, every single social media post for month after month. When you have posted against the vaccine 20 times, what are you trying to achieve with your 21st post. I ended up unfollowing numerous friends and people who I previously liked on social media. I'm triple vaccinated and have zero regrets.    

We are in big trouble if a more serious pandemic hits. A large section of the population will dismiss it as a hoax or claim they can cure it with some random cheap chemical.  

MIDLIFE CRISIS (FEMALE)

 

"The lesson is learned but the damage is irreversible." Colttaine

A common situation for a middle aged woman who is married or in a serious long term relationship. Things are getting a little bit stale with her partner and the thought creeps into her head that life must be better than this.

She may see her married friends divorcing their husbands, or join her single friends on girls nights out. This will further encourage her to leave her partner instead of attempting to fix the relationship. She may sleep around for a short time but will ultimately attempt to find a new relationship thinking she can do better than the man that she left.

Last time she was free and single was often over a decade ago. So all she remembers is men falling over themselves for a chance to date her. While she may have no problem obtaining men for one night stands and short term flings. Getting a man, especially a high value man to stick around with a middle aged woman often with kids in tow is difficult if not impossible.

Even in the case of Louise Redknapp who was once voted the "sexiest woman alive" by readers of a men's magazine. Has sunk to the depths of complaining about men ghosting her on dating apps. Her ex of course had no problem moving on to another woman. She literally threw away a lifetime marriage for a bit of short term fun and trying to resurrect a music career that had been dead for around 2 decades.

Recommended viewing Sexual Marketplace Value: Building A Better Model (bitchute.com) 31:40 - 37:00

 

QUIET QUITTING

 When there is no reward for success and no punishment for failure there is no motivation.

Hard work reaps its rewards, so you have been told your entire life by parents, teachers, the media and society in general.

You enter the workplace as an adult with this in mind and do your best to make a good impression. You meet production targets, rarely make mistakes and have an outstanding attendance and timekeeping record. Despite not being desperate for the money, you sometimes volunteer to do a bit of overtime on Saturday mornings or cover sickness absence.

You have a work colleague (let's call him Kevin) who doesn't share your work ethic. Kevin is often distracted from his job as a result of being constantly attached to his mobile phone. He had low productivity and frequently breaks workplace rules such as sneaking outside the rear fire exit for extra smoking breaks. Kevin is often late or absent from work, for some strange reason, always on Mondays when working the early shift or Fridays when working the late shift.

You resent having to work with Kevin and often having to do some of his work. It puts you in a difficult situation because if you start complaining to management, Kevin could in turn make life even more difficult for you, since you have to work with him every day. 

The contrast between yourself and Kevin couldn't be greater, so you reason that the management should be able to see this as well. At some point, one of two things must happen. The management will discipline him and motivate him to change his ways or they will get rid of him.  

One morning, the manager turns up unexpectedly early and catches Kevin having one of his many extra smoking breaks outside the fire exit. He is summoned to the office where he is shouted at for 10 minutes and warned about his future behaviour. Kevin did not receive any official disciplinary action. For the next few weeks, he avoids his smoking breaks and works harder only to quickly revert back to his former ways. For every occasion that Kevin gets caught and given a slap on the wrist by management, there will be dozens if not hundreds of occasions that he gets away with it.

Sometimes, the management do get it right, like when work colleague Steve is instantly dismissed after getting caught using a machine without the safety guard in place, a blatant violation of health and safety rules. 

Another employee, Pete, a hard worker with an excellent work record, gets into a heated argument with someone else. During this time, he used sexist / racist / homophobic language completely out of character, but was witnessed by several of the workforce. Following an unsuccessful appeal he is dismissed from his job. It's absolutely baffling how people like Kevin can cost the company thousands of pounds a year in lost productivity and overtime payments yet still remain in employment. While people like Pete can be dismissed for a poor choice of words.

PERFORMANCE PUNISHMENT 

One week the management were concerned because they were behind with several orders and desperately needed people to do overtime on Saturday morning. You can't make it this week because you have a big night out planned for Friday night. The manager uses guilt-tripping tactics to try and make you change your mind. You can't help but notice that Kevin doesn't even get asked.

Sometimes employees are taken off their regular jobs to do other duties. Examples include painting the walls, spreading salt on the carpark in winter or cutting the bushes outside in summer. You never get asked to do these jobs and have a break from the usual routine, they are nearly always given to Kevin. He still gets paid the same money to do an easier job while being free of the responsibilities.

KEVIN IS EFFECTIVELY REWARDED FOR BEING LAZY WHILE YOU ARE PUNISHED FOR WORKING HARD

This is a common scenario in the modern day workplace. You are constantly stressed by Kevin, doing his share of the work and the management doing nothing or rewarding him. But you don't want to leave your job. Maybe the money is good or it's close to where you live. Or it's highly likely the next workplace won't be any better. Something somewhere has got to change.

QUIET QUITTING

One day, the management asks you to work on Saturday but this time you firmly tell him "no not interested" and do not offer an explanation. You stop doing the little extras that you previously did. The management asks you to stop over to cover sickness and you refuse. You stop rushing around to meet targets and arguing with slackers like Kevin who don't.

One Thursday morning in November, you wake up with a slight headache and sore throat. Normally, you would drag yourself into work and solder on. This time you phone in sick and have a couple of days off. You have not had a day off sick for the entire year so why not.

Logically, the management should punish you for your downturn in performance, but instead you observe the opposite. They stop pestering you to work weekends or cover sickness. They sometimes complain when production targets are not met, but since they have never actually disciplined anyone, your job is safe. Your working life actually becomes less stressful as a result of this change in attitude. The management divert their attention to the new crop of younger gullible employees.

QUIET QUITTING IS NOT ABOUT BEING A SLACKER

You are still doing your job properly but not going above and beyond what is required. You do enough work to stay out of trouble but not too much so that you are taken advantage of. You would much prefer it wasn't like this but you have no choice. 

Quiet quitting is not just about employment it also applies to other areas of life such as human relationships. MGTOW is another form of Quiet quitting because what you get out rarely compensates for the effort put in.