COVID VACCINE

 

"The only side effects I ever suffered is a sore arm and feeling ill for a day. The only regret I have is not having the jab sooner"

WHY I HAD THE COVID-19 VACCINE

I was struck down with COVID before being vaccinated, and LONG COVID made my life hell for 6 months. The vaccine would have reduced the risk of this. Coronavirus vaccines cut risk of long Covid, study finds - BBC News  

Vaccines reduce the risk of infection and death 

It baffles me how so many people think "not 100% effective = useless"

Coronavirus infections three times lower in double vaccinated people - REACT | Imperial News | Imperial College London
CDC COVID-19 Study Shows mRNA Vaccines Reduce Risk of Infection by 91 Percent for Fully Vaccinated People | CDC Online Newsroom | CDC
COVID-19 by the numbers: The vaccinated continue to be protected (healthline.com)
The risk of dying from a Covid vaccine is lower than 1 in 31,000 - Full Fact

Antivaxxers cannot come up with a consistent argument among themselves. Here is a collection of the contradictory, crazy and just plain wrong claims I have heard about the COVID-19 jab.

They are called antivaxxers for a reason. People openly stated they weren't having the jab on social media long before it was even developed. Only to later claim they weren't having it for "safety reasons". 

Some claim the vaccine is "experimental", while others argue that the pandemic and subsequent vaccine rollout were planned "years ago"?

If there were no vaccine and more people died of COVID, the same people would still be clinging to earlier conspiracy theories, such as "it's a plot to kill off old people".

Claiming that "animal testing was skipped" for the COVID-19 vaccine, while others claim that "animals died during testing"?
Animal testing skipped - Search / X (twitter.com)    Animals died during testing - Search / X (twitter.com)

Claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine was "rushed", often making ridiculous comparisons to the time it took to develop the Polio vaccine when they obviously didn't have access to 2020 technology and communication.
Polio vaccine - Wikipedia

Not understanding that scientists built on decades of prior research on similar viruses, like SARS and MERS.

Never stating what a "proper" trial of the COVID-19 vaccine would look like.

Not understanding the concept of base rate fallacy, "i.e you are more likely to get the virus if vaccinated"
Base rate fallacy - Wikipedia

Never clearly defining "immune system overload".
‘Children’s immune systems are being overloaded with all these vaccines’ | Nursing in Practice

Claim that we are all going to drop dead in a couple of years from the COVID jab, while also claiming that there is no long-term data.

Global life expectancy was 72.6 in 2019, 70.9 during the pandemic and 73.3 in 2024. Around 5.55 billion people have had at least 1 dose of the COVID jab. 
Our Editor’s End of the Year Missive - by Human Progress

Objections to the modern COVID jab are just recycled arguments from generations ago. Such as the ones against the smallpox jab.
COVID-19 anti-vaxxers use the same arguments from 135 years ago | Faculty of History (ox.ac.uk)

Conflicting claims about the purpose of the jab. It's a microchip tracking device, mind control device, depopulation plan, plot to get us hooked on boosters, money-making scam, or simply ineffective.

If the COVID vaccine is harmful, it would be reasonable to expect that it "harms" some groups of people more than others. Yet they are deliberately vague on this.

Claims people forgot about, such as "the jab makes people magnetic". COVID-19 vaccines do not make you magnetic - Full Fact

We rarely see believers in these rival theories attacking each other, such as the hardliners who oppose all vaccines, in conflict with those who claim to be only against the COVID-19 vaccine.

Claiming that the COVID jab is not a "real vaccine", but never stating the cutoff point for effectiveness before it is no longer a vaccine? 

If there's a conspiracy behind the COVID-19 vaccine, the conspirators could have just lied to us and said it was a traditional vaccine instead of an mRNA vaccine. Since people are naturally more cautious of newer technology, it's a harder task to sell it to the general public.

Claiming they ONLY oppose mRNA vaccines but not campaigning for the use of non-mRNA vaccines?
The four types of COVID-19 vaccine – a snapshot | Healthcare IT News
Non-mRNA vaccines can be as good as Pfizer and Moderna in some scenarios : Goats and Soda : NPR

Someone dies after testing positive for COVID. It was never the virus that killed them, but if they died after having the vaccine, it was ALWAYS the jab that killed them.

Claiming facemasks were useless in 2020 but promoting them now to protect against vaccine shedding. 

Claiming the spike protein in the virus is harmless, but the spike protein in the vaccine is harmful?

It's only anti-vaxxers complaining about "vaccine shedding"? 

Having no problem with side effects from other medications.
Getting a COVID jab is safer than taking aspirin | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne (unimelb.edu.au)

Your immune system is not strong enough to handle a vaccine containing a few nanograms of fragmented DNA that over 60% of the world's population has had?  But strong enough to handle a virus that constantly mutates?

Trusting "natural immunity" while also stating that it's pointless to have the COVID-19 vaccine because the virus mutates too quickly to keep up?

Claiming the COVID vaccine is "poison", but not explaining clearly the makeup of that poison and at what dose?

Using the "FDA has not approved the vaccine yet" argument. Then, not getting the vaccine when it was approved on August 23, 2021?

FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine | FDA a hint Moving the goalposts - RationalWiki

Calling the COVID-19 RNA vaccine "gene therapy", but never explaining which genes are modified, deleted or added?
IntegralAnswers on X: " If you believed mRNA vaccines were integrating into human DNA, here’s how you’d prove it. A thread for skeptics, scientists, and those serious about evidence.

If it were possible to alter DNA with a vaccine, it would have been used to treat multiple genetic diseases by now.

Myocarditis is not a significant issue after a COVID-19 infection, but it becomes a major concern after the vaccine, despite occurring at much lower rates.
Myocarditis after covid infection - NEW SCIENTIST

Rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine based on "unknown long-term side effects". But having no problems with consuming tobacco, alcohol, illegal drugs, junk food, etc, at the same rates as the general population?

Have a problem with funding "Big Pharma" but having no problems funding the likes of big tobacco, big oil, South American drug cartels and companies that employ slave labour at the same rates as the general population.

Doctors spend a lot of time telling their patients to "lose weight", "stop smoking", "cut down on alcohol", etc. Yet according to many antivaxxers, they are also trying to deliberately kill or injure people with vaccines. 

Claiming doctors are clueless about vaccines, but trusting them on other health issues. 

"I trust my natural immunity" = I'm willing to catch a virus that could kill or give long-term side effects, so that my body has a better chance of fighting it if I catch it a second time. 
Repeat COVID Infection Doubles the Risk of Death (webmd.com)

Never explaining clearly and precisely at what point a vaccine becomes "non-experimental". By the same reasoning, we should have withheld penicillin from the WW2 injured with sepsis for over a decade until the long-term safety studies were in. 

It's mostly conservative Americans who seem to suffer high rates of adverse effects. Who just happen to be the same people who opposed masks, lockdown and promoted cures like horse dewormer. I have yet to meet someone who agreed with lockdowns but opposed the jab.

Widely conflicting figures about the mortality rate for the COVID-19 jab. If "millions died from the jab", where are they hiding all the bodies? 

Only paying lip service to so-called "vaccine injuries". If I personally knew half a dozen people who were killed/ injured (as many of them claim), I'd be doing a lot more than complaining on Facebook and Twitter

It's only anti-vaxxers who always know a (friend of a friend) who had family members suffer badly as a result of the vaccine? Often referred to as anti-vaxxer proximity syndrome.

Demanding impossibly high standards for vaccine safety, such as decade-long studies. Yet when a new COVID variant appears, they instantly declare it to be no problem with zero evidence and accuse the media of scaremongering.

Demanding that politicians should have the COVID-19 vaccine first to prove it's safe. Only to later claim that they weren't getting the real vaccine or that the politicians were getting preferential treatment.

Claiming that "cancer diagnoses will be missed" as an argument against lockdown. Only later to claim that cancers are caused by the COVID-19 vaccine.

Claiming that the "elites" were getting "placebo COVID jabs" and are now blaming the jab for King Charles'  cancer diagnosis?

"placebo jabs" until:2021-12-31 since:2021-01-01 - Search / X (twitter.com)

Truth In Numbers (Daniel) on X: "Buckingham Palace announces that King Charles has cancer. Members of the conspiracy cult remain silent... JOKING. They are losing their fucking minds. At least there's something besides the Taylor Swift psyop for them to obsessively post about. https://t.co/BNqLxA0dQh" / X (twitter.com)

Claiming Cancer rates have risen "off the scale" following the vaccine rollout, but the rest of the world doesn't notice.

Cancer screening: the urgent shouldn’t crowd out the important | The King's Fund (kingsfund.org.uk)

Mark Ware on X: "Tigress on point again (always the case with her stats). People 'witnessing all these turbo cancers' in their social circles are either statistical anomalies or have pantaloons that are well and truly ablaze." / X (twitter.com)

Forgetting that people "died suddenly" before 2020?
Go to Google, search for Teenager dies of cardiac arrest. Set date between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019. Get tens of thousands of results.
Sudden cardiac arrest: up to five Australians under 35 die each week | Australia news | The Guardian

Not explaining the difference between "COVID-injured" and "vaccine-injured".

Never defining "turbo Cancer", organ, cell type, genetic markers, or form of spread. Cancer is one of the most studied diseases.

Blaming every celebrity death on the COVID-19 vaccine? Even the Queen (96 years old) and Taylor Hawkins (10 different drugs in his system). Making it difficult, if not impossible, for the small number of people who have genuinely suffered side effects to be taken seriously. 
Anti-vaxxer blames COVID-19 vaccines for death of Queen Elizabeth II (skepticalraptor.com)

There's a "secret agenda" to kill people with a "bio weapon" or unleash an "experimental" vaccine on the population, then happily relay to you its success by a weekly update of excess deaths?

"They" are trying to kill us with vaccines while also providing defibrillators to keep people alive. 

The authorities are trying to hide critical vaccine side effects and imply that they are almost completely safe. While also allowing vaccine inserts and VAERS. 
What VAERS Is (And Isn’t) | Johns Hopkins | Bloomberg School of Public Health (jhu.edu)
A thread on logical fallacies and thinking errors anti-vaxxers commit when using #VAERS
https://twitter.com/SkepticJonGuy/status/1658320428870553601

"Blood clots from the jab" are being exposed by undertakers and embalmers, but not surgeons. They are part of the cover-up, but "big coffin" is free to say what they like.

"Pure bloods" don't exhibit the same level of concern for other issues, such as UV exposure and pollutants that accumulate in the body over time, which can often cause DNA mutations.

Claiming that RNA (vaccine?) has been deliberately put into the food supply, which would make fears about getting the jab pointless.
RNA in food - Twitter Search / Twitter

Claiming to be "patriots" and have no problem "trusting the government" when it comes to sending our people off to war. But not trusting the government with a free shot that can keep you out of the hospital?

Claiming vaccination should be a "personal choice". Then, celebrating cases like Dr Michael Kirk Moore, who gave fake vaccines to people?

Utah doctor, others charged with running COVID vaccine scheme, issuing fake records and giving fake shots (ksltv.com)
Dr. Michael Kirk Moore - Twitter Search / Twitter

Claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine gives HIV false positives when the HIV infection rates have actually gone down?
HIV incidence per 1,000 individuals, by age, World
HIV false postitves - Search / X

Claiming that we were going to have "endless boosters"? I have not been directly offered one in years despite being a "repeat customer".
Endless boosters - Twitter Search / Twitter
NHS England » NHS issues final call to come forward for COVID booster

Still promoting the Tiffany Dover myth, years after she received her vaccine?
"Tiffany Dover" until:2023-05-31 since:2023-01-01 - Twitter Search / Twitter
PolitiFact | Tiffany Dover is alive, despite persistent claims to the contrary

Claiming that there was going to be a worldwide compulsory vaccine passport scheme when the UK parliament voted against it by 369 votes to 126?
Roll of honour: every MP who voted against vaccine passports | The Spectator
COVID-19: Vaccine passports scrapped in bars and restaurants - BBC News

Thinking that 1940s smoking ads or the Thalidomide scandal are somehow relevant to 2020s medical science?
Is This a Real Vintage Ad Featuring a Pregnant Woman Smoking? | Snopes.com
"Science Was Wrong Before!" - Debunking Denialism

Claiming that there's going to be a Nuremberg 2.0 
"Nuremburg2.0" until:2021-12-31 since:2021-01-01 - Twitter Search / X
Learning from five bad arguments against mandatory vaccination - PMC (nih.gov)

Claiming that the blood of unvaccinated people will be the "new bitcoin" that will make antivaxxers super-rich.

BLOCKED, SHADOWBANNED, CENSORED, SHAMED

Surprisingly, not everyone agrees with me. Here's a growing list of blocks, bans and abuse I have received. Nobody wants to put up a rational response to the points I make.

https://www.facebook.com/atheistsagainstpseudoscientificnonsense
Blocked for posting my Alpha/Beta post as a response to misrepresenting Alpha males by "an old study on wolves".

https://www.facebook.com/DebunkingConspiraciesAotearoa - Made the usual misconception about the manosphere and incels. I posted my blog post on INCELS and was banned.

The Myth of the Alpha Male : r/skeptic - Skeptic page on Reddit made a post. My response, which is a copy of my Alpha/Beta post, got zero comments and one view. Shadowbanned.

Bad Medical Takes (@BadMedicalTakes) / X - I agree with a lot of what this person says. Bashing antivaxers and other stupid stuff. I started asking questions why men who do not want to have long-term relationships/marriage/children, with high body count women. Somehow qualifies as a "bad medical take". Also, their silence on fat acceptance, which is an entirely female movement. I was blocked. 

MSN UK: - Most comments are heavily censored anyway, and it won't even post certain words. I made comments referring to criminal sentencing if the gender of the victim and perpetrator were reversed. The last 20 comments have no up or down votes or following comments. Shadowbanned.

FEMALE LOGIC

 

Why don't men get the hint when I'm interested? Also, women, just because I smile at you, friend request you on Facebook or ask you to join me for coffee, doesn’t mean I'm interested in you that way

Shaming men for watching porn or buying prostitutes. Applauding them for marrying ex prostitutes or porn stars. Also thinks "pretty women" is a great film.

A hot woman in a bikini is "objectifying women". A fat woman in a bikini is "confident, brave & beautiful"

Starting a witch hunt against flirting, then complaining that men don’t approach them anymore.

Women don't care about looks. Also, she can do much better.

Claims we live in a "patriarchy" that's also cripples by a fatherless epidemic.

Men are "commitment phobic" when women initiate 2/3 divorces and relationship breakups.

Claims men are "commitment phobic", then dates an obvious player, knowing full well he's used and discarded dozens of other women before.

Claims male violence is "toxic masculinity", complains when men don't step in to protect her from danger.

Sexual history doesn't matter; use incel as an insult.

Wants equality but also wants special treatment.

Won't date a man who lives with his mother, but will date a man who lives with his wife.

He will make a good husband, father, and provider. I will make him wait for sex while the players and bad boys get it on the first date.

I want a man who will constantly pay attention to me & shower me with compliments. Then dumps him for being "needy".

Wears obviously revealing clothes, complains when men stare.

Shames men for staring at them in the gym, posts footage on social media for thousands of men to look at.

TOXIC FEMALE BEHAVIOUR

We hear so much about "TOXIC MASCULINITY" these days, so it would only be fair to highlight female behaviours that could be considered toxic. For individuals or society as a whole. Regardless of whether they are intentional or not. 

Fat acceptance/body positivity movement. Promoting obesity, which is a major health epidemic in the Western world. It robs women of their happiness, shortens their lifespans and reduces their dating/marriage prospects. This is one example where feminism literally has bodies on its hands. These four social media influencers were swept up by a movement that claims obesity is perfectly healthy... The tragic truth is they have all died under the age of 45 | Daily Mail Online
Paternity fraud. Man 'devastated' at being conned into thinking baby was his - BBC News Literally robbing a man of 16 years of time, effort, money and emotional investment.  

Sperm jacking - Forced fatherhood - Wikipedia

Lying about being on birth control to trap men. Husband wants divorce after wife gets pregnant and lies about birth control - Yahoo Life UK

Rewarding terrible men with sex. Players, violent men, drug dealers, bullies, compulsive liars, etc.
*This often leads to pregnancy and children growing up in bad homes or without a father figure at all. Children raised by single mothers are worse off by almost every available metric. Single Mother Parenting and Adolescent Psychopathology - PMC 
*Men are forced to adopt this behaviour to have sex. An entire industry (pick-up artist) had grown up teaching men to imitate this bad-boy alpha male attitude. Many former "nice guys" are now self-centred, arrogant, aloof, etc.
*Men used to get married in exchange for exclusive access to sex. Today, that concept is laughable, knowing that she gave it to some deadbeat for free is a massive turnoff.

False rape accusations. Example Man speaks of 'traumatic' false rape accusation - BBC News. Not only does this destroy men's lives, but it makes it much more difficult for genuine victims to get justice.

False sexual harassment accusations. Same problem as false rape, where a man's life can be destroyed on the mere say-so of a woman. The definition of "harassment" has become so wide that many men are scared of even striking up a conversation with women. Which is what women complain about.

Wearing skimpy clothing in the gym to entice men for social media content and then accusing men of being "creeps" for looking. Joey Swoll has an entire Twitter feed devoted to this. from:TheJoeySwoll creep - Search / X

Friend-zoning men instead of just saying no. Stringing them along with false hope. Using them for financial gain and emotional support while dangling the carrot of sex. A third of the women you date are only in it for free food: study. 
Giving men terrible advice, telling them to be emotionally open, nice guys, while having sex with men who are the exact opposite. Further reading FRIENDZONE

Gold digging and divorce rape. Marrying men they are not attracted to, then exploiting the law for cash and prizes. 

Assaulting men, then using the woman card to avoid punishment.

Voting for politicians and those who want to flood the West with 3rd world migrants. Then wonder why their towns are flooded with men who harass women Police plead with asylum seekers not to ‘harass or abuse’ women : r/unitedkingdom

Giving other women terrible advice. Just like with the previous example of fat acceptance. You can do better than him. Tattoos, short hair, and body count don’t matter. Many a woman has spent a lifetime single and lonely after following the advice of her friends.

Bait and switch from dating to LTR or marriage. She can't keep her hands off him, then uses sex as a bargaining chip. Almost every guy in a relationship can attest to the fact that women try to take you away from your friends, your hobbies, and ridicule you for things she never cared about when casually dating. Men who do this to women can be prosecuted for "controlling behaviour". 

Fast fashion, microplastics, forever chemicals, textile waste. Women produce at a much higher rate than men.

PRIDE - WHAT ARE THEY CELEBRATING EXACTLY ?

"As a social issue such as racism or sexual harassment becomes rarer, people react by expanding their definition of it, creating the illusion that the issue is actually getting worse."

As per my previous posts, I'm not a religious right-wing conservative who thinks homosexuality is some kind of mental illness (see GAY PEOPLE), nor do I have any objection to GAY MARRIAGE. This is about the point of devoting a whole month to "pride".

I grew up in an old coal mining town, which declined in the 1980s and 1990s. The local drinking scene when I first started (late 1990s) was male-dominated and contained lots of "manly men". Tattooed ex-miners, rugby players and even the occasional ex-boxer. 

In the early 2000s, the unthinkable happened: a gay couple took over one of the pubs. Yes, a small number of people (read older generation) did refuse to drink there for that reason. Overall, they did an excellent job of running the pub. It was safe to say that if this had happened 20 years earlier, they would have had bricks through their windows and driven out of town. Instead, they kept the place going for the best part of a decade.

With this in mind, what exactly is Pride for ????????

FROM CHAT GPT: "Pride Month raises awareness about the issues facing the LGBTQ+ community, such as discrimination, legal inequalities, and social stigma. It serves as a platform for advocacy, pushing for equal rights and acceptance."

Not only do they have "equal rights and acceptance" today, but society has overcompensated for what happened in the past. There are numerous forms of discrimination and ignorance. We all remember the kid at school who was horribly bullied and socially excluded. For reasons such as having a big nose or ears, being too clever or whose parents couldn't afford to buy fashionable clothes. What makes their pain and suffering somehow less worthy of attention and action than “homophobic abuse”?

It's even written into law, to beat up someone for being gay, and that's a “hate crime”, resulting in a more severe punishment and media attention. Beat up someone for wearing the wrong football shirt, and they are just another assault victim.

FROM CHAT GPT: "Overall, Pride Month is a celebration of love, equality, and human rights, aiming to create a world where everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, can live freely and authentically."

Ok, try being a straight man who has lots of sexual partners like Leonardo DiCaprio, and you get tons of bitter middle-aged women writing negative news articles about you. (1) THE MIDLAND MAN on X: "Fixed it for you.....it takes 2 to tango !!!! @ArwaM #LeonardoDiCaprio #Guardian #Patriarchy https://t.co/KE8oBjS704" / X
Ok, try being a straight man who thinks the quality of women is better outside his home country. (1) 17 MINUTES Of Modern Women Having MELTDOWN Over Passport Bros - YouTube
Ok, try being a straight man who rejects marriage/traditional relationships and your a winey loser and a basement dwelling, mycognist, incel.

FROM CHAT GPT: "Education: Pride Month educates the broader public about LGBTQ+ history, issues, and the contributions of LGBTQ+ individuals to society. This education fosters understanding and acceptance."

Yes, gay people were treated horribly in the past (for example, Alan Turing), and society has come a long way in correcting that. Unfortunately, this idea is being pushed too far, and people living today are expected to feel guilty for events that happened generations ago, just like black people and slavery.

You don't need an entire month to do this, you don't need to turn it into a commercial racket where products are covered in pride flags. It's reached the point where they are constantly redefining "homophobia" so that even the remotest criticism of pride is evidence of it. 

FROM CHAT GPT: "Pride Month, celebrated annually in June, serves multiple important purposes: Commemoration of LGBTQ+ History: It honours the history and struggles of the LGBTQ+ community, particularly the Stonewall Riots of June 1969 in New York City, which were a pivotal moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights."

If you are a gay person of the older generation, this is understandable, but not if you are young. Most people in the past went through struggles.
Do I need to celebrate the fact that I wasn't forced to do national service? Or never received corporal punishment in school? Or didn't have to do dirty and hazardous work in a coal mine? 

Homosexuality has been legal since 1969, and gay marriage has been legal since 2014. Also, the extra legal protection gay people get via "hate crime" laws. Personally, I believe some gay people deliberately provoke outrage and rile up the religious/far-right crowd. Example Paul Golding on X: "What the hell has London become? This is degenerate filth! https://t.co/cF6zX25J6j" / X When they react to it, gay people will use this as "proof" that society is homophobic and their movement is still relevant.

FROM CHAT GPT: "Support and Solidarity: It provides a sense of community and support for LGBTQ+ individuals, offering a space where they can feel accepted and safe. Allies also participate in Pride events to show their support and solidarity."

100% agree, but when I want to do this as part of “the manosphere”, I'm treated like a social outcast, abused with shaming language, blocked, censored and have to use password-protected hidden forums to do so.

BAD BOYS

 

Served a nine-year sentence for grand theft in 2002, was arrested and charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm, arrested in June 2014 on felony charges of street terrorism and a misdemeanour charge of resisting/obstruction of justice, charged with gang membership, charged with probation violation YET MILLIONS OF WOMEN WOULD STILL DATE HIM BECAUSE HE IS "HOT". 

       

"Women fall for a criminal with tattoos because the primal parts of her brain detect a man who would have protected her from sabertooth tigers and invaders during prehistoric times. Increasing the chances of passing on her genes".

In prehistoric times, women's mate selection was optimised for survival and reproduction. Then humans started settling into a more agricultural existence, followed by building civilisations. The type of man once essential to survival was now often viewed as a criminal. 

Society came up with ways to prevent women from breeding with these men. The first was an arranged marriage, where the families would do the selection process. It is still common in many cultures today. Arranged Marriage Countries 2025

While we didn't have arranged marriages in the West, there was enough societal pressure to ensure women picked a man based on long-term compatibility. The 1950s woman may have secretly found the unemployed car thief attractive, but she would never have been able to win the approval of her parents. It also incentivised men to be good members of society in order to attract the best women. 

Following the sexual revolution, women could (in theory) now have sex with whom they wanted, without pregnancy. The societal measures preventing women from breeding with bad men were reduced. If anything, the growing single motherhood problem encouraged a growing welfare state. Effectively rewarding women's bad choices with the tax from good, stable, hardworking men.

The Modern Woman has regressed to Palaeolithic, pre-traditionalist instincts over traditional common sense. This means a woman is processing her relationship world with her hindbrain, using hardwired instincts formed millennia ago. She is still “in the ice age” as far as this region of the brain is concerned. This changes her mentality in many ways.

All man is good for is what he can do for her today; his past actions don’t accrue to the present. 

The dating world had been flipped on its head. Decent, respectful man, good family, Steady, paying job like an accountant - bad (as it's boring).
Upper bicep tattoo, bully, Mysterious, criminal past, history of cheating on other women. - Good, (as it’s dangerous and exciting)

Hostility towards a Man's Problems: In the wild, women had contempt for male weakness because it jeopardised their survival. So when the regressed modern woman sees a man lose a social interaction, fall ill, or suffer the loss of one of his parents passing, she loses attraction for him. She may even develop contempt for him. She will often go looking for another man if the weakness is too much. The one thing she won’t do is be there for him. 

Women are almost inhumanely opportunistic. It is a mindset that may have been fitting during the Palaeolithic Era, but not now and certainly not the basis for a relationship.

Alpha Worship & Vine-Swinging: The modern woman is always ready to vine swing. That’s why you hear women today say, “I don’t believe relationships should be about hard work. If it’s work, why bother?”. They always have one foot out the door. 10 years hooked on alpha cock does not disappear overnight. The modern woman habituates to the sexual strategy used; unlike men, she cannot compartmentalise and move on with her life. She will flirt with alpha males she sees in the restaurant, your friends, God forbid, your boss - it will simply happen, and she will be unapologetic about it. 

The need for Tingles: the modern woman demands what she had in her 20s. Tingles. Even when married. This means she will constantly shit-test you and make you jump through hoops. You will need to maintain the perception of female options (a regressed woman only wants a pre-selected man with options who is choosing her to satisfy her narcissism). You will need to use dread game to keep her off balance and thinking you might be leaving her. Only through these psychological games can a modern woman be 'convinced' to remain in a relationship.

Women unknowingly pursue men with traits that would have advantaged them in 15,000 BC. Most men don't want to live down to that standard today. If attracting women means being something men don't want to be, they may simply pass.

CAROUSEL

 

"The top tier of most desirable men are more than happy to use average women for one-night stands and short to medium-term relationships but will never stick around long term".
"Average women delude themselves into thinking that because a 'hot guy' will sleep with them, they can also get that type of guy to commit long term" 

In the old days, when people married young and most people got married, there was assorted mating. Top men married top women, average men married average women, below below-average men married below-average women. This gradually faded with the sexual revolution, then was mostly eliminated with dating sites and hookup apps.

Today, the top tier of men (less than 20%) get the lion's share of the women. Unattractive women now have access to more attractive men than they could have ever hoped for in the past. The catch is that they will often only get him for one night. Women assume that because a “hot guy” will have sex with them, they can get such a man to commit. He becomes her standard by which future men are measured. This is why her past is so important.

Women will often squander the prime years of their lives engaging in short-term relationships with high-status men at the expense of long-term happiness and stability. She dates obvious players and bad boys, then acts totally shocked when the relationship fails. Average men who would make good husbands, good dads and would give her a lifetime of commitment are frequently rejected or used as placeholders.

The party doesn't last forever, as she hits middle age, she becomes aware that the dating scene is slowly replacing her with younger, more attractive women. She has 2 brutal options, the first one being to stay single and continue engaging in these increasingly unfulfilling short-term relationships. Eventually becoming a bitter cat lady on antidepressants.

She will often be under social pressure to settle down, such as from her parents. Her friends might all be getting married off, or she needs a responsible man to help raise her children from previous failed relationships. The only way she can do this is by massively reducing her standards. In other words, dating a man whom she wouldn't have given the time of day to during her prime years. Years of “punching above her weight” have given her a false sense of her own attractiveness, which then carries over into future relationships. She settles for Mr Average with a mixture of regret and resentment.

She makes him wait for sex: “I want to get to know you better”, “It’s special, so it can wait”. It can go on date after date. It’s a test to see if he's a thirsty beta male. If he waits, he's “passed” the test. A woman is using her sexuality against the man in a kind of delayed revenge against the men who lured her via Tingles. Mr Average gets the payback, blue balls, and becomes the spreadsheet husband. All as a “reward” for being the decent man who's good enough to stick around and support her kids. It was the players and bad boys who got the blind loyalty and first date sex.

A woman’s carousel behaviour has altered her relationship approach permanently. It carries over into later life and creates massive headaches and unwanted behaviour.

The cumulative psychological toll of being used and discarded by dozens of men has left a permanent sense of bitterness against men. A woman's subconscious instinct has been programmed over millennia to never lash out against alphas (for fear of consequence); she feels she can displace her anger (from a different set of men) on the man she settles with. He will pay the price for all the times she got charmed by the player, only to get ghosted or later discover he was also banging 3 other women.

She insecurely raids his phone “because she’s been 'hurt before”, wants to know which girls he spends time with, cuts off friendships with single male friends, and more, all in over-compensation for her relationship failures with more ‘prolific’ men before.

After spending her 20s dating hot studs, waking up next to Mr Average every morning simply doesn't do it for her. She's an Alpha Widow, forever pining over top-tier men she couldn’t keep. Like a ex junkie with a dealer on every corner (social media, dating apps, text messaging) she will flirt with these men and be totally unapologetic about it, or even acting on it. Her cheating will be justified on an “amazing connection” she felt with a guy; any BS post-hoc rationalisation to justify the drug-like high of Tingles that she refuses to stare down in her sexual prime, and now has become an addiction.

A traditional long-term relationship cannot be built on a modern woman’s carousel mindset. 

RED FLAGS - How I know a relationship is doomed.

 

"When you know, you know"

Part of what keeps me in the manosphere / red pill community is the frequency of seeing things I read online play out in real life. One example of this is looking at other people's relationships and social media accounts, seeing the signs, and then watching them fail almost as regularly as clockwork. 

The following is a list of indicators that a relationship is going to fail. Note that fail does not mean complete failure as in divorce / separation but could manifest itself in other ways such as cheating, dead bedroom, drama or an unhappy situation that lingers for years. See Marriage The Men's Dictionary: MARRIAGE (the-mens-dictionary.blogspot.com) 

She earns more money than him or could do in the future. Women are biologically hardwired to "marry up", outearning her partner goes against this and is one of the biggest factors in divorce. Why Divorce Rate is Higher for Female Breadwinners (sflg.com)

She's with a man who is completely different to the men she dated in her 20s. She used to date arrogant bodybuilders and nightclub doormen but now she's with a placid, skinny accountant from a "nice" family. She's with him by necessity and not choice as she couldn't get the men she was genuinely attracted by to commit long term.

She's had lots of sexual partners. If he's the 50th man she's been with there's only a 2% chance that he's the best she's had.

He's had lots of sexual partners. Although it applies to a much smaller percentage of men. A former "player" who's accustomed to sexual variety is extremely unlikely to stay faithful to one woman for the rest of his life. 

She has a history of dating players and "bad boys". She's secretly addicted to the emotional rollercoaster ride these men provide. If she's not getting it from Mr Stable nice guy these bad men are only a Tinder swipe away.

Negative body language. He's frequently leaning into her and she's pulling away. (see picture).

He's excessively praising her on social media. Telling the world how lucky he is to have her. Classic beta behaviour.

They have moved to a quiet, boring town. He knows she's likely to cheat (or has previously cheated). Thinking he can reduce this risk by removing her from nightlife/alcohol. 

Date nights, especially if posted by him. He's trying to rekindle a dead bedroom situation with money, which is largely ineffective.

Joint Facebook or other social media account. Definite insecurity, especially if it was his idea.

Relationship status changes. From "In a relationship" to "it's complicated" and back again.

He's largely absent from her social media posts. It's all her kids, pets and girls' nights out.

She excessively praises his beta qualities. Such as how good a "provider" he is. Overcompensating for her lack of genuine desire for him.

He's decayed, physically, emotionally or financially. Put on weight, mental illness or lost his job. Women are secretly repulsed by male weakness because in prehistoric times it jeopardised their chances of survival. 

Her friends are divorcing or cheating on their partners. Birds of a feather flock together.

MANOSPHERE GARBAGE

Haters are going to hate but there are several ideas floating around in the men's online community that are doing it more harm than good.

BIG PHARMA CONSPIRACIES - Ironically, many of the people promoting these have no problem taking completely unregulated supplements.

COVID VACCINE - Looking at some of the illogical garbage that antivaxxers spout.

VETTING - The belief that you can still have a 1950s-style marriage with a woman in a modern Western country. All you have to do is screen her carefully beforehand.

WHITE REPLACEMENT THEORY - Blaming elites for the collective choices of millions of people following the introduction of the birth control pill.

FAR RIGHT - They have a few good ideas and a lot of bad ones.

ADOLESCENCE - NETFLIX ANTI MALE PROPAGANDA

 

Adolescence (TV series) - Wikipedia

"You can't argue that it's "only fiction" when it's influencing government policy".

Knowsley MP urges screening of Stephen Graham's “Adolescence” in Parliament and schools - MerseyNewsLive

Starmer backs campaign to show Adolescence in schools | Politics News | Sky News

A 13-year-old boy is labelled an "incel", implying that a 13-year-old boy should be having sex which is repulsive in and of itself. 

The plot is about the character Jamie being bullied and called an incel online. Eventually, he snaps in revenge on his bully. The story is about the dangers of social media not ideology. Nothing to do with hatred of women or misogyny.
The Purpose of a System is What it Does - YouTube

Most murder victims are males killed by another male. Homicide in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics 

If young men were stabbing or even harming women as a result of the internet you can guarantee women's groups would have been broadcasting the statistics everywhere. They haven't.

A white male growing up in the UK makes it even more unlikely. Surrounded by female teachers he would have been disproportionally punished for any verbal or physical abuse in the direction of girls. More realistic would have been a newly arrived immigrant from Afghanistan or Somalia with a totally backward attitude towards women and girls. That was never going to happen as diversity and inclusion only work one way.

It completely misrepresents the manosphere as only comprising "toxic revenge-driven incel sites". He would likely have come across sites helping him improve his social and dating skills. Not to focus on one girl at a time and how to deal with rejection. Failing that, how can men live a life in the absence of female relationships? Further reading: ANTI MANOSPHERE TACTICS

It misrepresents what the manosphere actually says. Example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip1jKyq7VLo&t=1057s

I have personally never heard of the "emoji codes", despite being part of "the manosphere" since early 2017. Encountered all different types of men from all walks of life.

It gives the impression that jilted 13-year-old boys are an "Andrew Tate video away" from committing murder. In reality, they will sulk in their bedrooms playing video games. Many who follow Andrew Tate are not into his views on women but on work, success and money

Murders where you can actually prove in court that the perpetrator was directly influenced by "toxic incel websites" are extremely rare. Elliot Roger (2014), Nikolas Cruz (2018), Alek Minassian (2018). The fact that Elliot Rogers's name always comes up when discussing violent revengeful incels more than a decade later shows exactly how rare it is. 

The character Jamie was raised in a traditional 2 parent household. Fatherless Single Mother Home Statistics | Fix Family Courts

Any future sequel will never show the killer receiving mountains of fan mail from admiring girls while in prison. Florida school shooting: Accused killer Nikolas Cruz receives 'piles' of fan letters in jail - ABC News Ironically the very incel they ruthlessly ignored while he was on the outside.

The killer was interviewed by females. Highlighting female power over males. Women have no frame of reference for the male experience.

IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE SHOWN IN SCHOOLS

Imagine being a 13-year-old and watching it in school amongst your peers and being made to wonder. Am I the only one not having sex?’  Talk about added pressure…

Social media is doing the most harm to school girls. Their suicide rates have risen 83% since the invention of the smartphone. Why have suicide levels risen among young people and what can be done to tackle this? | National Statistical

ANTI MANOSPHERE TACTICS

BURNING DOWN THE STRAWMAN

I challenge you to find one manosphere critic who doesn't do the following.

Highlighting the few % extreme ends of the spectrum. Angry basement-dwelling incels on 4chan or highly questionable men like Andrew Tate. Pretending that he represents the "manosphere" when in reality he's one of many voices with drastically different opinions. I have personally never liked or shared any content from that man since he's been around. Ignoring the lifeline that it has given millions of men. Helping average men improve their social and dating skills. Men are trying to improve their relationships/marriage. Men’s rights activists are campaigning against unfair divorce and child access laws. Helping divorced men to recover. Helping sexually unsuccessful men cope with single life (i.e the very incels they despise but won’t help) Ignoring the female equivalents of men's bad behaviour. Twitter hashtags such as #MaleTears, #MaleFragility, #MenAreTrash, and #KillAllMen.
Highlighting content creators who go viral for their bad takes, the guy screaming on a livestream, the grifter selling nonsense, the angry kid with no social skills, and they present him as representative of the entire ecosystem. While ignoring the ones who don’t, such as Caleb Jones, Phil Mitchell: Specialist Working With Abused Males, or Troy Francis The calm voices, the older men, the thoughtful conversations about dating skills, divorce law, family court incentives, fatherlessness, male loneliness, and suicide never make the conversation because those complicate the story. Complexity is bad for the narrative they’re trying to sell.

Ignoring people like Rollo Tomassi who has been in the space since 2004.

Straw manning valid manosphere concepts as “incel language” as an attempt to discredit them in one swoop instead of dealing with them individually, rationally and logically. Examples include Alpha male, Red Pill, Blue Pill and 80/20.  Portray the manosphere as a bizarre cult-like group. Women who opt out of dating are labelled "strong and independent" by comparison. The phrase “going their way” debunks this on its own. Analysis of a Guardian article https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxXcBejDN2g&t=0s It's easier than engaging with actual data or admitting institutional neglect of male issues.

Instead of asking why young men feel alienated or why family courts create such resentment, the conversation becomes “good people versus bad people.” Once that frame is set, anyone talking about the underlying issues gets lumped in with the most inflammatory, controversial personalities.

Using words like INCEL, MISOGYNY, PATRIARCHY,  RAPE CULTURE, TOXIC MASCULINITY, SEXISM, and HARASSMENT without ever clearly defining what they mean. Overusing these words to the point where they become meaningless. 
Claiming the 80/20 rule is based on a “single decade-old OK Cupid study”, when in reality it’s based on masses of data and even the confessions of women themselves. 80/20 isn’t accurate anyway. RATIONAL MALE EXPLAINS 80/20 RULE
Tinder Experiment Proves How Brutal it Is for Average Guys
Half-truths such as “they say only 1 man reproduced for every 17 women”, when in reality it happened for a short time, 8000 years ago, following the invention of agriculture.

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man - Pacific Standard