STRONG & INDEPENDENT

Women who loudly & defensively claim they’re “strong” or “independent” are actually telegraphing the exact opposite.

Ladies, you are not strong and independent 

If you have a meltdown because a man rejected you for a woman who is younger, childless and more attractive.

If you care that a man uses prostitutes, sex dolls or seeks women abroad when you would never have sex with him yourself.

If the only reason you have a home is money from an ex-husband/boyfriend or government handouts.

If you refuse to do jobs that men routinely do, such as refuse collecting.

If you get upset at work over something that would never concern a man.

If you preach that you are single because men are afraid of “strong women”.

If you vote for Political parties because they promise to give you more benefits.

If you think men should give up their seat for you on public transport when you have been sitting in an office all day, and they have been working on a building site.

If you demand multiple expensive dates with a man before anything else happens.

If you demand that he marry, move in with you or else!!

If you demand men drop their dating standards while you refuse to drop yours.

If you block a man talking to a more attractive friend at a bar because you secretly don't want her "off the market".

If you think a random man should put himself in danger to protect you from a male predator when you preach male violence is "toxic masculinity".

If you think that a native British man should put themselves in danger to protect you from an Afghan immigrant when you voted for the left-wing parties that invite them in.

MISOGYNY ACCORDING TO THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT

A loaded list of statements that automatically assumes there's a straight yes/no answer. In some cases, it means denying evidence in front of my own eyes. 

Believe women's gains over the last 25 years have been bad for men. 
Girls now consistently outperform boys at GCSE and A-level. Women now make up the majority of university students. When it was the reverse in the 1980s, it was a problem to be solved; now it's often seen as something to celebrate.

Believe women currently have things better than men in British society.
They do in certain areas such as
Education (see above)
Average life expectancy
Lower rates of suicide, accidents, and substance abuse
Lower incarceration rates
Shorter sentences for comparable crimes in some studies
Less likely of being victims of violent crime

Believe the purpose of feminism is to put men down.
It was originally founded with good intentions (the right to vote and education), but many feminists online today put men down. Check out the popularity of "incel" as an insult.

Believe the large majority of heterosexual women only want to date the most physically attractive 20% of men.
It's actually much less than 20%, confirmed by overwhelming evidence from dating apps and sites.
Many women will state on their dating profiles that a man should be 6 feet tall, which excludes more than 80% of men right off the bat.

Believe most heterosexual women only want to date men of high social status.
In Thailand, you will see many local women with Western men but never the reverse.
Famous men usually have tons of women throwing themselves at them, just read a few autobiographies.

Believe heterosexual women are biologically hardwired to be attracted to more aggressive, dominant men
They bombard violent male criminals with fan mail.
When they start dating fragile, emotionally open men en masse, I will change my mind.

Believe women should dress in a way their partner finds attractive. 
They can dress how they like, if a girlfriend dresses in a way that men find attractive on a girls' night out, but not for me, I know it's time to bail.

Believe if a man goes on a date with a woman and pays for dinner and drinks, it is fair for him to expect sex.
No, men shouldn't do expensive dates until a relationship is established.

Believe it is wrong for a woman to have lots of sexual partners, but it is not wrong for men to do so.
Women can have as many partners as they like, and men have every right to say no to a woman based on their relationship history. Men with high partner counts are also a bad bet for a long-term relationship, see STUDS vs SLUTS

Believe it can be a woman's fault if she is sexually assaulted in some circumstances. 
Depends on how you define "fault". Visiting a country like India as a female solo traveller would be stupid. It's easier to advise women not to go than to try to alter a backward culture of half a billion men. 

Have a favourable view of Andrew Tate.
I disagree with at least 90% of what comes out of his mouth. There wouldn't be anything wrong with taking tips from him for kickboxing or business.

Have a negative opinion of women
I have many female friends and relatives I care about.
I just lowered my expectations when it comes to relationships with modern women.

LOW BIRTH RATES AND POPULATION AGING

 

Environmentalists welcome lower world populations. In reality, the global population is due to increase for at least another 25 years, thanks to Africa. The continent is also industrialising rapidly, cancelling out what's happening in Europe. 

Older and reduced populations in the first world mean a more inefficient use of resources, such as mass transit designed for large populations. Innovation is often driven by young minds, decreasing the odds of solving problems such as the energy crisis and environmental issues.

Governments will be forced to raise taxes (+10%), raise retirement ages (to at least 70), import immigrants (3 million in the UK) or likely all 3. These will be deeply unpopular with the people. 

Immigrants who are of no benefit will trigger the rise of right-wing populism. Rich people and businesses will relocate to foreign tax havens.

The cost of living will explode, incentivising people to have fewer children, creating a vicious circle that we are already seeing in China. Young people are already giving up on careers or owning property.

The pension and healthcare systems will be crippled, and many people will be forced to care for ageing parents themselves. Those with children will have to balance the two.

Political parties will court the "grey vote" since older people vote more. Young people's issues will be ignored in favour of pensions and healthcare. Alienating them even further.

My dad's own life has improved dramatically (he was a virtual recluse) since my sister gave birth to twins. If half of 30-year-old women today are childless, that's an epidemic of elderly loneliness in the future. 

Old people are starting to form parallel societies; some coastal towns already have an average age of over 60. Young people will move out, leading to a significant decline in intergenerational mixing.

Old vs young will be a future battleground. Young people who can't get on the property ladder will deeply resent the old for hoarding all the wealth. 

It's going to get messy......

ANTI MISOGYNY CLASSES

 

What constitutes “harmful behaviour”? I’ve seen an endless stream of op-eds, news clips, morning show segments, and interviews about the UK’s sexist operant conditioning project, but not one person has defined the misogyny, ideology, or behaviour it’s supposed to ‘correct’.

How Labour plans to tackle Andrew Tate's influence on boys - Yahoo News UK

It has already sparked a massive online backlash. Some men (and even some women) feel accused or blamed simply by the term misogyny. Right-wing media and opponents call these classes “anti-men, “ideological indoctrination, and “woke nonsense. When people enter training defensively or hostilely, learning drops sharply. Evidence from behavioural change research shows that people rarely reflect deeply when they feel morally attacked. People disengage, fake compliance, or actively resist.

Lack of definition: What exactly is misogyny? decided entirely on the whim of most middle-aged female teachers. Same problem as “toxic masculinity”.

Lack of credible messengers who deliver the message matters enormously. Boys are not going to listen to middle-aged women who have zero frame of reference for the male experience. Or gay/effeminate men, for that matter.

Likewise, how is the long-term “success” of these lessons going to be measured? They will likely end up being box-ticking exercises with no long-term enforcement.

Ignoring class, culture, and social context. Men from countries where arranged marriage is the norm have never had to learn how to interact with women and face rejection. 

White working-class boys are the primary target, while exceptions will be made for new arrivals from Afghanistan. This glaring contradiction will create a backlash on its own. Distrust of authority is already high in working-class or marginalised communities.

Lack of real-world benefits. Anti-smoking campaigners, for example, could easily find a long list of testimonials from people whose health and bank balances were ruined by tobacco. By contrast, “Nice guys” who treat women with “respect” will get ignored, ridiculed and friend-zoned by women who chase players and bad boys. Countless examples show this. Confessions of a Reformed InCel | M3

At worst, it will radicalise young men far more than Andrew Tate ever could.